A rule in use at inspection bodies; names changed

The inspector marks an item as “Fails” and, at the end, leaves the result as “Compliant.” It may be a wrong tap or a criterion applied badly.

Whatever the cause, the report says two opposite things. The distributor returns it.

The rule

Checks: The installation result and each checklist item.
Blocks when: The result is Compliant and some item is marked Fails, NC, Critical or Non-critical.
Message to the inspector: “When the status is Compliant you can’t mark the following items as Fails or NC: Shut-off valve, Upper ventilation.”
Applies to: Forms with a result and a checklist.

Test cases

This is how it’s simulated before saving: if a case doesn’t give the expected result, nothing is saved.

A Non-compliant report must have at least one failed item. If it has none, the result doesn’t add up either.

With the RETGAS connector in Claude, all you have to write is:

«Make a rule so that a Compliant report can’t have items marked Fails or NC, and have the message say which ones.»

It says which items to review

The message lists the conflicting items. The inspector goes straight to them.
The person decides

The rule doesn’t change the result. It flags the contradiction and the inspector decides whether to fix the item or the result.

The engine flags and the person decides. Rules only run when they’re active and linked to the form. How they’re configured

Result consistency is the first thing whoever receives the report looks at. Better to have the engine check it first.